Snapp.FastTwice the revenue. No new hires. Routine work done in under a third of the time.
The change that made the difference: client emails, their attachments and court correspondence in one complete matter view. Snapp.Fast reads the threads and the documents, finds the facts that matter and prepares a reply based on the full matter. The lawyer has the context to answer the client precisely, the first time.
In this firm, the drafts are so accurate that manual corrections are minor. The managing partner checks the sources, adjusts what needs it and approves. She does not rewrite from the start. The firm does routine work 3.4× faster and has doubled its revenue without hiring.
Emails and attachments, read together at last
The client's question is in an email. The answer is often in the attachments, in earlier threads or in the court file. Reading the last message is not enough.
Snapp.Fast reads client emails and their attachments automatically. It matches them to the court correspondence and the matter documents. The draft reply takes into account each request, each document received and the latest exchange with the other side. It does not just rephrase the last email.
This knowledge of the matter is what makes the drafts useful. Each fact keeps its context, each source stays one click away and missing information is flagged. The lawyer spends the time on the legal analysis and the advice.
Ask for the result. Do not rebuild the file.
The managing partner gives the instruction on Telegram, by text or voice:
- "Prepare one reply to the client's last emails. Use the attachments."
- "Draft the particulars of claim from the file."
- "Prepare the index for the 50-document bundle."
- "Update the client on the latest court notices."
- "Add the client's comments to the witness statement."
Snapp.Fast finds the information in the authorised sources and prepares the work in the firm's usual tools. The lawyer reviews, adds the legal analysis where needed and decides what is sent or filed.
Tired of CE-File, MyHMCTS or the court portal?
Open the notification. Download the order. Find the matter. Read it. Write the client update. Court correspondence makes work long after it arrives.
We built a court-system connection for this firm. It puts court correspondence in the same flow as the emails and the matter documents. Each item arrives with its attachments, a summary, the points to consider and, when needed, a draft reply. The lawyer gets the sources and the work already prepared. Nothing is retyped.
For solicitors in England and Wales, CE-File and MyHMCTS are relevant examples. We confirm the service used for your matters, permitted access and connection scope before quoting. A sealed order, hearing notice or listing can then become a client update ready to approve. The connection built for the reference firm does not establish a working connector to these services.
The managing partner now replies to opposing solicitors much faster. She checks the decisive passages, completes the legal analysis and approves.
A new event needs a client update. Manually: 30 minutes to find, read and draft. With Snapp.Fast: 10 minutes to check, correct and approve.
Correspondence is collected every day. Each item shows its source and its date. If a collection fails, the lawyer sees it.
Twice the revenue, without hiring
Revolead.ai brought in the new clients. Snapp.Fast gave the firm the capacity to serve them. Revenue doubled, the team stayed the same and the cost rate did not move.
New clients only become revenue when the firm can do the work. This firm could.
Where the time goes
| Task | Manual | With Snapp.Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Reply to a client who sent several emails | 36 min | 15 min |
| First assessment of a new document pack | 3 h | 45 min |
| First-pass triage of a 400-document file, about 1,000 pages | 25 h | 3 h |
| Substantive draft or revision | 4 h | 1 h 45 |
| Bundle, assembled and checked | 90 min | 30 min |
| Matter status, rebuilt from emails and documents | 36 min | 12 min |
Routine work, 3.4× faster
For the same approved work, review included, the firm now uses about 29% of the lawyer time it used before. The work covered is done 3.4× faster.
The calculation compares manual time with the time spent on the instruction, the source checks, the review, the corrections and the exceptions with Snapp.Fast. It weights each task, court correspondence included. Hearings, court attendance and client meetings are not in the calculation.
And 3.4× is a floor. It was measured one task at a time. In practice, the lawyer starts several tasks at once, like a team of associates working for her. While Snapp.Fast prepares the work, she works on something else.
What you can ask for every day
One reply that covers every email. The client sends several emails with questions and attachments. Snapp.Fast reads them all, matches them to the matter and prepares one reply. Each question gets an answer or goes on the list of points to clarify. The lawyer checks the draft and its sources. The edits stay small.
Particulars of claim, drafted from the file. Snapp.Fast collects the facts, the correspondence and the documents to prepare a first draft. Each authority it cites is checked against the source, not invented. The reference stays available, so the lawyer can check the judgment and its relevance. An authority that cannot be verified is flagged, never presented as good law. The lawyer checks the claims, the legal basis, the statement of truth and the documents referred to, then settles the final version.
Your precedents, or ours. You have your own precedents? We use them, so your structure and drafting style stay the same. You have none? We supply proven templates and adapt them to your practice. Either way, you control the final version.
A 50-document bundle index in 5 minutes. Snapp.Fast prepares the index from the matter documents. The lawyer checks each description and that it matches the document. How long would it take your team by hand? This example is the index only. The table above covers assembling and checking the full bundle.
Client comments, tracked in Word. Snapp.Fast adds the relevant comments to the witness statement with tracked changes and shows the points that need a decision. The lawyer controls the argument and the final wording.
The right attachment, found. The lawyer asks for a certificate of service or the signed engagement letter. Snapp.Fast finds it in the correspondence and prepares the draft with that attachment. If the document is missing, it says so. It never attaches a different file.
Counsel, process servers and agents, linked to the matter. Snapp.Fast finds their emails and attachments, prepares instructions to counsel, service requests and document transfers, and files the replies in the correct matter. You see what was served, what counsel returned and what is still open. You approve each send and you control the procedural deadlines.
Matter billing, with no retyping. Snapp.Fast matches engagement letters, invoices, payments and disbursements such as counsel's fees, court fees and process servers. It prepares a statement of what was billed, paid and outstanding, and the documents for your accountant. You check the differences and approve the reminders. Your accounts system stays the reference.
The lawyer stays in charge
Legal judgement, advice, strategy and fees stay with the lawyer. Nothing leaves the firm without approval. Filing stays with the lawyer.
Each task belongs to one matter. If the match is unclear, Snapp.Fast asks. Every source stays one click away, and missing items are shown. Existing drafts are checked before any update, so the lawyer's edits are never lost.
Before we connect a source, the firm decides the permitted data, users, providers, locations and retention period.
For UK solicitors and law firms
Start with one task that costs you time: a reply to the other side built from the latest court notices, a client update, or a bundle for a hearing. Snapp.Fast prepares the work in your usual tools. You review, correct and approve.
For England and Wales, we confirm your access to CE-File or MyHMCTS and the permitted connection scope before we include it in the fixed quote. Court systems and professional rules differ elsewhere in the UK. The connection described in this case study is the one built for the reference firm, not evidence of a UK deployment. Service, procedural deadlines and filing stay under the lawyer's control.
Official guidance for England and Wales: MyHMCTS and HMCTS E-Filing (CE-File).
A complete matter. A draft prepared by an expert. You approve.
Speak with the managing partner of the firm in this case study. If you want to proceed, we agree the result, the acceptance criteria and the fixed quote before work starts.
Data protection and professional confidentiality
We assess the proposed processing against the UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018 as amended, ICO guidance on AI and data protection and the rules of the firm’s professional regulator. For solicitors in England and Wales, this includes the SRA’s duties of client confidentiality. Confidentiality and legal professional privilege remain distinct from data-protection compliance.
Before live matter data is used, we agree the permitted data, access, providers, storage and access locations, transfer safeguards, retention and deletion. We check provider training terms and any need for anonymisation or pseudonymisation. The lawyer keeps final review of advice, documents and external communications.